扫码阅读
手机扫码阅读
快速学习COSMIC方法之十三:如何识别读和写?

我们非常重视原创文章,为尊重知识产权并避免潜在的版权问题,我们在此提供文章的摘要供您初步了解。如果您想要查阅更为详尽的内容,访问作者的公众号页面获取完整文章。

麦哲思科技任甲林
扫码关注公众号

Summary of Data Interaction in Software Measurement
Understanding the difference between reading and writing data interactions in software is generally straightforward, with a low probability of error. These actions involve the transfer of data between software and storage media. Reading moves data from persistent storage to internal processing, while writing does the opposite.
Key Points to Identify Reading and Writing:
- Data Groups and Interest Objects: Each read or write involves data groups of a single interest object. Multiple reads or writes must be identified if multiple interest objects or different data groups of the same interest object are involved. Repeated reads or writes of the same data group count as a single action, as seen in software that reads exchange rates at regular intervals.
- Do Not Confuse Reading with Input and Writing with Output: Reading and writing refer to data movement to and from persistent storage, respectively. Input and output involve data movement to and from the user of the function. These should not be confused as long as the user and persistent storage are distinguished.
- Temporary Data Exclusions: Reads or writes of temporary data that are not interest objects and are used for implementation purposes do not count towards function points. An example is counting failed login attempts, which is not preserved after the function is completed.
- Single Function Point for Read Requests: Issuing a read command and then receiving the data is counted as a single read function point. If user input is needed, an output followed by an input is counted, but if no specific user data request is necessary, only an input function point is counted.
- Deletion Counts as Writing: Deleting a data group is considered writing, which aligns with common understanding and requires no further explanation.
想要了解更多内容?

麦哲思科技任甲林
扫码关注公众号

麦哲思科技(北京)有限公司总经理 敏捷性能合弄模型评估师 认证的Scrum Master 认证的大规模敏捷顾问SPC CMMI高成熟度主任评估师 COSMIC MPC,IAC 成员,中国分部主席
425 篇文章
浏览 239.5K
麦哲思科技任甲林的其他文章
决策与解决方案练习结果分析
2008年3月4日对15人进行了DAR过程域的培训,针对一个设计方案选择的场景进行练习。划分为3个小组,每组5人。练习持续45分钟,点评45分钟。第1组练习的结果:评价指标权重方案1方案2方案3开发时间3321系统收益3
漫谈敏捷方法中的信任
在实施敏捷的方法中需要组织建立信任的文化,即管理者信任项目组,可以放手让项目组去做事情。 人对其他人都是有信任关系的。你走在大街上,你不会认为你看到的任何人会过来刺杀你,否则你就会穿着一身盔甲上路了,这就是一种信任。 人对其他人的信任都不是无底线的。比如,当有人过来找你问路,找你推销商品时,你可能就避而远之,这就是一种不信任。 无约束的信任只可能是一些短期的、不重要的小事。
CMMI 4级实践问题30问-5
第15问:如何选择控制图?最常用的控制图是哪几种? 答: 在选择控制图时,首先选择要判断数据的类型: 连续型变量可用的控制图有:X-R,X-S,XMR等,离散型变量可用的控制图有:U,c,z,P,nP图等。X-R,X-S图是适合分组数据的,如果分组的容量小于10则选择X-R,否则选择X-S图,如果是单点值则选择XMR。对于离散型变量要判断分布的类型,如果是二项分布则采用P,nP图,如果
CMMI 3.0的276条实践中英文对照
CMMI 3.0在2023年4月6日发布了,包含了31个实践域,276条实践。本文试图把276条实践的中英文对照如下。
正式评估时被访谈人员应该注意什么?
在进行CMMI的正式评估时,被访谈的人员应该快速、准确、条理清楚回答评估组成员的问题,这样才能在比较短的时间内让评估组成员做出正确的判断。根据我的访谈经验,被访谈人员应注意如下的问题: (1) 听清楚问题,再回答问题。 有的被访谈人员可能是由于紧张,没有听清楚评估组的成员问的是什么问题,就答非所问,浪费时间。当你不能确定提问者的问题的含义时,可以要求评估组的成员对问题做出进一步的解释
加入社区微信群
与行业大咖零距离交流学习


PMO实践白皮书
白皮书上线
白皮书上线